Expanding the phenome and variome of the ROBO-SLIT pathway in congenital heart defects: toward improving the genetic testing yield of CHD.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown the implication of the ROBO-SLIT pathway in heart development. Within this study, we aimed to further assess the implication of the ROBO and SLIT genes mainly in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and other human congenital heart defects (CHD). METHODS: We have analyzed a cohort of singleton exome sequencing data comprising 40 adult BAV patients, 20 pediatric BAV patients generated by the Pediatric Cardiac Genomics Consortium, 10 pediatric cases with tetralogy of Fallot (ToF), and one case with coarctation of the aorta. A gene-centered analysis of data was performed. To further advance the interpretation of the variants, we intended to combine more than 5 prediction tools comprising the assessment of protein structure and stability. RESULTS: A total of 24 variants were identified. Only 4 adult BAV patients (10%) had missense variants in the ROBO and SLIT genes. In contrast, 19 pediatric cases carried variants in ROBO or SLIT genes (61%). Three BAV patients with a severe phenotype were digenic. Segregation analysis was possible for two BAV patients. For the homozygous ROBO4: p.(Arg776Cys) variant, family segregation was consistent with an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance. The ROBO4: c.3001 + 3G > A variant segregates with the affected family members. Interestingly, these variants were also found in two unrelated patients with ToF highlighting that the same variant in the ROBO4 gene may underlie different cardiac phenotypes affecting the outflow tract development. CONCLUSION: Our results further reinforce the implication of the ROBO4 gene not only in BAV but also in ToF hence the importance of its inclusion in clinical genetic testing. The remaining ROBO and SLIT genes may be screened in patients with negative or inconclusive genetic tests.

Identification of non-synonymous variations in ROBO1 and GATA5 genes in a family with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect with a high index of heritability. Patients with BAV have different clinical courses and disease progression. Herein, we report three siblings with BAV and clinical differences. Their clinical presentations include moderate to severe aortic regurgitation, aortic stenosis, and ascending aortic aneurysm. Genetic investigation was carried out using Whole-Exome Sequencing for the three patients. We identified two non-synonymous variants in ROBO1 and GATA5 genes. The ROBO1: p.(Ser327Pro) variant is shared by the three BAV-affected siblings. The GATA5: p.(Gln3Arg) variant is shared only by the two brothers who presented BAV and ascending aortic aneurysm. Their sister, affected by BAV without aneurysm, does not harbor the GATA5: p.(Gln3Arg) variant. Both variants were absent in the patients' fourth brother who is clinically healthy with tricuspid aortic valve. To our knowledge, this is the first association of ROBO1 and GATA5 variants in familial BAV with a potential genotype-phenotype correlation. Our findings are suggestive of the implication of ROBO1 gene in BAV and the GATA5: p.(Gln3Arg) variant in ascending aortic aneurysm. Our family-based study further confirms the intrafamilial incomplete penetrance of BAV and the complex pattern of inheritance of the disease.

Prognosis of Adults With Isolated Left Ventricular Non-Compaction: Results of a Prospective Multicentric Study.

Background: Whether left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) bears a different prognosis than dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is still a matter of debate. Methods: From a multicenter French prospective registry, we compared the outcomes of 98 patients with LVNC and 65 with DCM. The primary endpoint combined cardiovascular death, heart transplantation, and hospitalization for cardiovascular events. The two groups presented similar outcomes but different left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) (43.3% in LVNC vs. 35.95% in DCM, p = 0.001). For this reason, a subgroup analysis was performed comparing only patients with LVEF ≤ 45%, including 56 with LVNC and 49 with DCM. Results: Among patients with LVEF≤ 45%, at 5-year follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 33 (58.9%) among 56 patients with LVNC and 18 (36.7%) among 49 patients with DCM (p = 0.02). Hospitalization for heart failure (18 [32.14%] vs. 5 [10.20%], p = 0.035) and heart transplantation were more frequent in the LVNC than in the DCM group. The incidences of rhythmic complications (24 [42.85%] vs. 12 [24.48%], p = 0.17), embolic events, and cardiovascular death were similar between LVNC and DCM cases. Among the 42 patients with LVNC and LVEF > 45%, the primary endpoints occurred in only 4 (9.52%) patients, including 2 hospitalizations for heart failure and 3 rhythmic complications, but no embolic events. Conclusion: In this prospective cohort, patients with LVNC who have left ventricular dysfunction present a poorer prognosis than DCM patients. Heart failure events were especially more frequent, but embolic events were not. Patients with LVNC and preserved ejection fraction present very few events in 5 years.

Phenotype/Genotype Relationship in Left Ventricular Noncompaction: Ion Channel Gene Mutations Are Associated With Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Biventricular Noncompaction: Phenotype/Genotype of Noncompaction.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist concerning genotype-phenotype relationships in left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). METHODS AND RESULTS: From a multicenter French Registry, we report the genetic and clinical spectrum of 95 patients with LVNC, and their genotype-phenotype relationship. Among the 95 LVNC, 45 had at least 1 mutation, including 14 cases of mutation in ion channel genes. In a complementary analysis including 16 additional patients with ion channel gene mutations, for a total of 30 patients with ion channel gene mutation, we found that those patients had higher median LV ejection fraction (60% vs 40%; P < .001) and more biventricular noncompaction (53.1% vs 18.5%; P < .001) than the 81 other patients with LVNC. Among them, both the 19 patients with an HCN4 mutation and the 11 patients with an RYR2 mutation presented with a higher LV ejection fraction and more frequent biventricular noncompaction than the 81 patients with LVNC but with no mutation in the ion channel gene, but only patients with HCN4 mutation presented with a lower heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Ion channel gene mutations should be searched systematically in patients with LVNC associated with either bradycardia or biventricular noncompaction, particularly when LV systolic function is preserved. Identifying causative mutations is of utmost importance for genetic counselling of at-risk relatives of patients affected by LVNC.

Left atrial dysfunction as marker of poor outcome in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The incremental prognostic value of left atrial (LA) dysfunction, emerging in various clinical contexts, remains poorly explored in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). OBJECTIVE: To assess LA strain correlation with outcome in HCM. METHODS: A cohort of all 307 consecutive patients presenting with HCM between 2007 and 2017 (54±17 years; 34% women), with comprehensive echocardiography at diagnosis and LA peak longitudinal strain (PALS) and LA peak contraction strain (PACS) measurement, was enrolled and occurrence of HCM related cardiac events analysed. RESULTS: Clinically, atrial fibrillation (AF) was present in 13%, New York Heart Association functional class II-III in 54%, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration was 199±278pg/mL. By echocardiography, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) was 67±10%, LV thickness 21±5mm and European Society of Cardiology HCM risk score 3±3%, with 109 patients (36%) presenting obstructive HCM (LV outflow gradient 21±32mmHg). LA diameter was 41±8mm [with 109 (36%) presenting LA diameter ≥40mm], LA volume index 50±26mL/m2, PALS 24±13%, PACS 11±7% and LA peak systolic strain rate (LASRs) 1.7±0.6 s-1. In addition to AF, age, BNP, LVEF and LV thickness were all independent determinants of lower PALS, with odd ratios almost unchanged after adjustment (all P ≤0.0004). At a mean follow-up of 21 (range 18-23) months, patients with adverse cardiac events (n=65) presented with more impaired LA function (all P ≤0.0005), with a significant association between impaired PALS and worse outcome, hazard ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-0.97, P<0.0001]. After comprehensive adjustment, PALS remained strongly associated with worse outcome, adjusted hazard ratio 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.94; P=0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: The present study, by gathering a unique HCM cohort, suggests a strong link between LA dysfunction and poor outcome, to be further investigated.